(In reply to comment #23)
> Created an attachment (id=27726) [details]
> Third draft of the patch
>
> The attached patch contains the latest changes described in the previous
> comment.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
The code is clear and constitutes a good patch. I did not read all the details of the discussion, so I might have missed some important point, but the area parameters constitutes the physical area of the device and could be filled with default values based on the reported driver dimensions?
(In reply to comment #23)
> Created an attachment (id=27726) [details]
> Third draft of the patch
>
> The attached patch contains the latest changes described in the previous
> comment.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
The code is clear and constitutes a good patch. I did not read all the details of the discussion, so I might have missed some important point, but the area parameters constitutes the physical area of the device and could be filled with default values based on the reported driver dimensions?