Comment 15 for bug 227183

Revision history for this message
Bart Van Loon (bart-ingen) wrote :

ok, sorry, my bad again (it's getting late :-)). I messed up hexadecimal and binary notation here.

anyway, I'm stuck. from the code above, you can tell that packet[1] is responsible for the greatest part of the X coordinate value. when I put my pen in the top left corner, this packet contains a decimal 1. in the bottom left corner, a decimal 1 again. but somewhere in the middle, it gives me back a 2. in the top right corner, it's a 6, whereas in the bottom right corner it's a 5.

how can one ever convert such results into decent pointer coordinates?

I'm guessing something is missing, or going wrong, at the device initialisation. any hints from anyone?