> It probably has something to do with it, but what's the bug number and/or
> Bugzilla where it was reported? Looking for #8641 in this Bugzilla leads to
> closed one: "xcb should provide (and use in generated C files) opcode defines."
I found it - it's in the kernel Bugzilla: http://<email address hidden>/msg31026.html
These problems look like being connected for me. I'm not a kernel hacker (although I've read both Linux Kernel Development, 2nd Edition and Understanding Linux Kernel ;-) but if you'd need someone with real hardware to help debugging, I'm ready to do this job.
(In reply to comment #12)
> It probably has something to do with it, but what's the bug number and/or
> Bugzilla where it was reported? Looking for #8641 in this Bugzilla leads to
> closed one: "xcb should provide (and use in generated C files) opcode defines."
I found it - it's in the kernel Bugzilla: http://<email address hidden> /msg31026. html
These problems look like being connected for me. I'm not a kernel hacker (although I've read both Linux Kernel Development, 2nd Edition and Understanding Linux Kernel ;-) but if you'd need someone with real hardware to help debugging, I'm ready to do this job.