> What release would that be and why do i not see anything in the mesa tree?
That was a reference to this thread which the person who copied my text
didn't include.
> Have you?
Yes and I can't see the files you are referring to further below in your
post.
Filename is
CLE266CN400CN-CX700CN800XORG40072-kernel-src_20071213d.tar.tgz
from 13th December
> What about: uma_dri.so, libOGL.so, libGL.so.1.2 ?
> See any code for those?
No and I don't have those files.
> If you say out loud that maybe some people should look at some things, maybe
> you should verify for yourself first... blah blah blah I rule bla bla
Where did I say that. I had assumed you have not looked inside this
particular file. Apparently I was right.
Thats not saying you should. I couldn't care less if you do or don't.
Furthermore, I'm not the person to comment the quality or value
of this new release. So far noone here did and thats what
we're all actually waiting for.
> What release would that be and why do i not see anything in the mesa tree?
That was a reference to this thread which the person who copied my text
didn't include.
> Have you?
Yes and I can't see the files you are referring to further below in your
post.
Filename is CX700CN800XORG4 0072-kernel- src_20071213d. tar.tgz
CLE266CN400CN-
from 13th December
> What about: uma_dri.so, libOGL.so, libGL.so.1.2 ?
> See any code for those?
No and I don't have those files.
> If you say out loud that maybe some people should look at some things, maybe
> you should verify for yourself first... blah blah blah I rule bla bla
Where did I say that. I had assumed you have not looked inside this
particular file. Apparently I was right.
Thats not saying you should. I couldn't care less if you do or don't.
Furthermore, I'm not the person to comment the quality or value
of this new release. So far noone here did and thats what
we're all actually waiting for.
But instead I'm being attacked for what exactly?