I'm evaluating scanning programs for linux and xsane comes highly recommended, but a typical color scan of a test document I'm using generated a huge 17440k pdf vs. a 824k from simple-scan and visually I am not seeing any difference. The grayscale scan was 5596k and seems to suffer from some kind of aliasing issue around letters that are on a diagonal, which doesn't happen with simple-scan and results in a much smaller (b&w though) 280k document, albeit with its own issues since it is b&w vs gray. All scans were done at 300dpi.
I've been trying to figure out why xsane generates such massive pdfs and ended up here, is the bug still relevant? Seems very old.
was this ever resolved?
I'm evaluating scanning programs for linux and xsane comes highly recommended, but a typical color scan of a test document I'm using generated a huge 17440k pdf vs. a 824k from simple-scan and visually I am not seeing any difference. The grayscale scan was 5596k and seems to suffer from some kind of aliasing issue around letters that are on a diagonal, which doesn't happen with simple-scan and results in a much smaller (b&w though) 280k document, albeit with its own issues since it is b&w vs gray. All scans were done at 300dpi.
I've been trying to figure out why xsane generates such massive pdfs and ended up here, is the bug still relevant? Seems very old.