Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:53:02 +0200
From: Christian Marillat <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden> (Denis Barbier)
Cc: <email address hidden>, Tim Bagot <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#263073: xlibs: Super still Super+Hyper
<email address hidden> (Denis Barbier) writes:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:03:46AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> <email address hidden> (Denis Barbier) writes:
[...]
> Christian, thanks for your reply, but I believe that sawfish will still
> have trouble when capplets is fixed. The attached test-sawfish-mods.c
> file helped me to understand how sawfish (and emacs) manage modifiers.
> It is copied from src/keys.c
Frankly you need to understand that sawfish is dead. So I'm just fixing
important bug report and this one is not an important bug report.
So you can do what you want with this bug report I'll simply ignore this
bug.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:53:02 +0200
From: Christian Marillat <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden> (Denis Barbier)
Cc: <email address hidden>, Tim Bagot <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#263073: xlibs: Super still Super+Hyper
<email address hidden> (Denis Barbier) writes:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:03:46AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> <email address hidden> (Denis Barbier) writes:
[...]
> Christian, thanks for your reply, but I believe that sawfish will still
> have trouble when capplets is fixed. The attached test-sawfish-mods.c
> file helped me to understand how sawfish (and emacs) manage modifiers.
> It is copied from src/keys.c
Frankly you need to understand that sawfish is dead. So I'm just fixing
important bug report and this one is not an important bug report.
So you can do what you want with this bug report I'll simply ignore this
bug.
Christian