On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:49:08AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> ok. I don't see anyplace in xterm that I could improve on here
> (since it sees only one of the alt/meta definitions). There is
> some provision for keys having more than one name and modifier
> (which may have issues to resolve).
>=20
> Does gnome-terminal still work if you remove the definition for Meta_L?
Yes.
-- Guido
--WChQLJJJfbwij+9x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden> Escape no longer working
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:48:57 +0200
From: Guido Guenther <email address hidden>
To: Thomas Dickey <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#260232: xterm: XTerm*metaSends
--WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:49:08AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> ok. I don't see anyplace in xterm that I could improve on here
> (since it sees only one of the alt/meta definitions). There is
> some provision for keys having more than one name and modifier
> (which may have issues to resolve).
>=20
> Does gnome-terminal still work if you remove the definition for Meta_L?
Yes.
-- Guido
--WChQLJJJfbwij+9x pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
nRIn88szT8+ ZCYRAgfcAJ9BqpU E1Ez4BoxY4OQ01V wxDWhujQCeLaW0 +LElGbuI=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA/
JUCF+IwRua4nZvB
=bzea
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WChQLJJJfbwij +9x--