Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:15:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <email address hidden>
To: Denis Barbier <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: Ross Burton <email address hidden>,
Debian X Strike Force <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#259740: Windows key no longer treated as modifer, just as
Super_L
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Denis Barbier wrote:
> The problem with -6 is that a patch had not been applied, so these
> changes were incomplete and Meta keys were broken in Debian packages.
> So IMO this bug should be cloned and reassigned to metacity, but I let
> Debian maintainers decide what to do.
FYI: The version that Ross is running is built from trunk that already
contains the patch you provided.
Fabio
--
<user> fajita: step one
<fajita> Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
<user> fajita: step two
<fajita> When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:15:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <email address hidden>
To: Denis Barbier <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: Ross Burton <email address hidden>,
Debian X Strike Force <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#259740: Windows key no longer treated as modifer, just as
Super_L
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Denis Barbier wrote:
> The problem with -6 is that a patch had not been applied, so these
> changes were incomplete and Meta keys were broken in Debian packages.
> So IMO this bug should be cloned and reassigned to metacity, but I let
> Debian maintainers decide what to do.
FYI: The version that Ross is running is built from trunk that already
contains the patch you provided.
Fabio
--
<user> fajita: step one
<fajita> Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
<user> fajita: step two
<fajita> When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.