On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:20:31AM -0000, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> well, a saner way would probably be to just add the "new" host to the
> xauthority file instead of dropping all security checking
>
Right, but if the security checkings have no use, then we should drop
them for localusers. If there is a use we should get a fix for this
upstream.
redhat appears to be convinced that there is no reason for this
security for local users. do we have reason to believe that thats
wrong?
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:20:31AM -0000, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> well, a saner way would probably be to just add the "new" host to the
> xauthority file instead of dropping all security checking
>
Right, but if the security checkings have no use, then we should drop
them for localusers. If there is a use we should get a fix for this
upstream.
redhat appears to be convinced that there is no reason for this
security for local users. do we have reason to believe that thats
wrong?
- Alexander