Comment 44 for bug 1768610

Revision history for this message
Marco Trevisan (TreviƱo) (3v1n0) wrote :

Yeah, I basically did the same too, but honestly I didn't want to change nux again with another SRU (I preferred to fix this with just one on that side); and most importantly in a such way. As it would now include some checks that depends on changes done in other packages, making from my POV things even more hackish and annoy to matain and easy to be broken.

Not that other solutions wouldn't involve the other package (say mesa) to act on nux file, but that should be in a way that nux is not aware of that, creating any kind of "inter-dependency" in between them.