black screen after upgrade to gutsy
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
xorg (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
I upgraded to Gutsy from Feisty, after rebooting I see the logo while Ubuntu loads, but then I only get a black screen where I normally get the Gnome login screen. The keyboard stops working as well. Pressing Caps-Lock has no effect on the indicator-leds.
I found the following error in /var/log/syslog
Oct 18 21:36:24 poppie gdm[6892]: WARNING: gdm_slave_
Oct 18 21:36:28 poppie gdm[6910]: WARNING: gdm_slave_
Oct 18 21:36:33 poppie gdm[6925]: WARNING: gdm_slave_
Oct 18 21:36:33 poppie gdm[6891]: CRITICAL: gdm_config_
Lots of errors in /var/log/
/etc/gdm/
Warning: Could not retrieve EDID because get-edid is not installed (1)
6941 6891
xinit /etc/gdm/
X Window System Version 1.3.0
Release Date: 19 April 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3
Build Operating System: Linux Ubuntu (xorg-server 2:1.3.0.
Current Operating System: Linux poppie 2.6.22-14-386 #1 Sun Oct 14 22:36:54 GMT 2007 i686
Build Date: 29 September 2007
Before reporting problems, check http://
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/
(++) Using config file: "/etc/X11/
dlopen: /usr/lib/
(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/
(EE) Failed to load module "freetype" (loader failed, 7)
(II) Module already built-in
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_1: line 8 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_2: line 11 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_3: line 14 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_4: line 17 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_5: line 20 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_6: line 23 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_7: line 26 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_8: line 29 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_9: line 32 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_10: line 35 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_11: line 38 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_12: line 41 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Ungrab: line 45 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_ClearGrab: line 48 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Next_VMode: line 51 of xfree86
expected keysym, got XF86_Prev_VMode: line 54 of xfree86
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
> Warning: Multiple interpretations of "NoSymbol+
> Using last definition for duplicate fields
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_1: line 74 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_2: line 78 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_3: line 82 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_4: line 86 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_5: line 90 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_6: line 94 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_7: line 98 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_8: line 102 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_9: line 106 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_10: line 110 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_11: line 114 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_12: line 118 of pc
expected keysym, got XF86_Ungrab: line 90 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_ClearGrab: line 96 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Prev_VMode: line 102 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Next_VMode: line 112 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Ungrab: line 208 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_ClearGrab: line 209 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Prev_VMode: line 210 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Next_VMode: line 212 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Ungrab: line 235 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_ClearGrab: line 236 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Prev_VMode: line 237 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Next_VMode: line 239 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Ungrab: line 262 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_ClearGrab: line 263 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Prev_VMode: line 264 of keypad
expected keysym, got XF86_Next_VMode: line 266 of keypad
> Error: Can't find file "pc105" for symbols include
> Exiting
> Abandoning symbols file "default"
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
/usr/bin/X: symbol lookup error: /usr/bin/X: undefined symbol: fs_register_
XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
6941 6891
Maybe there is something wrong in gnome or xkb?
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Bugs/ FindRightPackag e. I have classified this bug as a bug in xorg.