Yes. As mentioned it is a single patch to apply, that has been available since the very first day the bug was reported, actually 8 years ago (I was wrong when I said 6). Incidentally, I was the second reporter of this issue, with Bug #572943, the second lowest numbered duplicate, one month before the bug that is hosting this discussion was opened. I started saying that the bug needed a higher priority in 2013. So, please, do not enter a discussion with a long history just to label things and be aggressive, rather start asking why that single patch remained not applied for 6-8 years.
Just to recall some history, the issue began with the use of EDID information for DPI being *intentionally* removed upstream, for many reasons including adhering to what other OSs used to do at that time. When some other people and I started insisting to have the feature restored at least in ubuntu, there was resistance. Resistance was partially justified (e.g. on the upstream lists, see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705 "CLOSED" as "NOT A BUG") by the consideration that merely reintroducing the feature was not enough and that a better vision for managing the growing variety of display types (including hi-dpi) was needed. This is why considerations on the approaches taken by other OSs and on long term desiderata started being discussed alongside the short term solutions.
Yes. As mentioned it is a single patch to apply, that has been available since the very first day the bug was reported, actually 8 years ago (I was wrong when I said 6). Incidentally, I was the second reporter of this issue, with Bug #572943, the second lowest numbered duplicate, one month before the bug that is hosting this discussion was opened. I started saying that the bug needed a higher priority in 2013. So, please, do not enter a discussion with a long history just to label things and be aggressive, rather start asking why that single patch remained not applied for 6-8 years.
Just to recall some history, the issue began with the use of EDID information for DPI being *intentionally* removed upstream, for many reasons including adhering to what other OSs used to do at that time. When some other people and I started insisting to have the feature restored at least in ubuntu, there was resistance. Resistance was partially justified (e.g. on the upstream lists, see https:/ /bugs.freedeskt op.org/ show_bug. cgi?id= 23705 "CLOSED" as "NOT A BUG") by the consideration that merely reintroducing the feature was not enough and that a better vision for managing the growing variety of display types (including hi-dpi) was needed. This is why considerations on the approaches taken by other OSs and on long term desiderata started being discussed alongside the short term solutions.