Comment 8 for bug 280671
Revision history for this message
|
|
#8 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
(In reply to comment #7)
> This time not many cycles are spent in dixLookupPrivate, but a lot of time is
> spent in pixman itself.
The 'Msecs ellapsed' value varies wildly here, but I don't see any lasting CPU usage that would allow for a useful profile. Is that different from what you're seeing?
Either way, this seems likely to be a different issue from what you reported here initially, so it should probably be tracked separately.
It would also be nice if you could try these with the xserver master branch, which has some EXA optimizations over the 1.5 branch.
> I attached the profiles, as well as my "benchmark".
Next time, please include a Makefile instead of an x86 binary. :) (and add a toplevel directory to the tarball)