Comment 18 for bug 255372

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:35:15PM -0700, <email address hidden> wrote:
> --- Comment #4 from Sergey V. Udaltsov <email address hidden> 2008-08-15 17:35:14 PST ---
> Yes I know about fedora. And I am not terribly happy with that. What I can
> propose (for linuxes only - dirty hack!) is
> 1. Optional. Adding abnt2 section to keycodes/evdev - with missing keycodes. I
> am not sure what is the status of the keycode KPPT in evdev.
> 2. patching rules/base in order to use evdev keycodes wherever possible. The
> section would look like:

This is why I was suggesting different rules. Even with evdev, you
still have some variance between models, and your options are
essentially to have your models as evdev, evdev_abnt2, etc, or to create
a new ruleset called evdev, and let the model field actually refer to
models again.

evdev is here to stay, so we're going to have to deal with it somehow.