Comment 9 for bug 455281

Revision history for this message
James83 (giacomopennella) wrote :

Thank you Brian, I'm new here and forgive my English!

For the bug:
I recompiled wpa_supplicant as suggested in the Bug #207447 and I appreciated a significant improvement in stability of the connection. Anyway: I found out that it make no difference if I insert an usleep() in the wpa.c code. I tried with low values (50-100) and long values (100000-1000000).
With the recompilation I can mostly get connected: when I can not I have to renice the process to -19
An issue about wpa.c:
I use the 0.6.9 version of wpa_supplicant and in the wpa.c code I put the usleep() in the line 996, after:
if (wpa_supplicant_send_4_of_4(sm, sm->bssid, key, ver, key_info,
           NULL, 0, &sm->ptk))
 return;

this because the code was a little bit different from what explained by Christof Kaser in the above mentioned bug
is it correct?I will investigate...