This will solve the problem if the backport is pushed into dapper-security (resp. edgy-security). But I think this is not what everyone wants, since it can potentially break systems.
If the new version only goes into dapper-updates, then it doesn't fix this bug. Everyone will assume that a system subscribing dapper + dapper-security contains no known security hole.
This will solve the problem if the backport is pushed into dapper-security (resp. edgy-security). But I think this is not what everyone wants, since it can potentially break systems.
If the new version only goes into dapper-updates, then it doesn't fix this bug. Everyone will assume that a system subscribing dapper + dapper-security contains no known security hole.