Hello!
This is actually a problem of Wt, not of code using Wt.
See test case. It does not use boost.signals directly.
I can compile this test on Ubuntu Natty and Debian Squeeze:
g++ -lwt -lwthttp 900354.cpp -o 900354
Errors on Ubuntu Lucid (e.g., undefined reference to `boost::signals::detail::slot_base::create_connection()')
Errors on Debian Squeeze with manually built Wt 3.2.0. (undefined reference to symbol 'boost::signals::trackable::~trackable())
I'm suspecting fresh Ubuntu Oneiric to fail. Can anyone test this?
3.2.1-1~natty~pgquiles1: no errors
Natty with ppa https://launchpad.net/~pgquiles/+archive/wt/+build/2618285 no errors
Maybe, it is a bug of some Wt version, not of Debian or Ubuntu packages.
Hello!
This is actually a problem of Wt, not of code using Wt.
See test case. It does not use boost.signals directly.
I can compile this test on Ubuntu Natty and Debian Squeeze:
g++ -lwt -lwthttp 900354.cpp -o 900354
Errors on Ubuntu Lucid (e.g., undefined reference to `boost: :signals: :detail: :slot_base: :create_ connection( )')
Errors on Debian Squeeze with manually built Wt 3.2.0. (undefined reference to symbol 'boost: :signals: :trackable: :~trackable( ))
I'm suspecting fresh Ubuntu Oneiric to fail. Can anyone test this?
3.2.1-1~ natty~pgquiles1 : no errors
Natty with ppa https:/ /launchpad. net/~pgquiles/ +archive/ wt/+build/ 2618285
no errors
Maybe, it is a bug of some Wt version, not of Debian or Ubuntu packages.