Comment 40 for bug 1054590

Revision history for this message
In , Juan-lang-s (juan-lang-s) wrote :

(In reply to comment #36)
> (In reply to comment #34)
> > I see the patch has been processed. I assume that the future release of Wine
> > 1.5.16 should have the fix in it...yes?
>
> What does tell you the patch has been processed?

I suspect it was a simple misunderstanding of the patches list: the patch disappeared off the end of the list.

David: AFAIR the patch wasn't reviewed. This is the dreaded "not obviously correct" patch status, in which Alexandre isn't convinced, but he's not quite sure what's wrong with the patch, either. It's up to the patch author to reflect what might be done to improve it. As I recommended in comment 18, tests that demonstrate that Windows really does behave this way by default would be pretty convincing. They're also not easy.