My comment on comments in #45ཿ
* "the original bug report was about the embedded bitmaps" - actually the original bug said it "makes sites look ugly in Firefox and other browsers"
* although the replacement tahoma font works fine for non-bold and bold on LCD monitors, on LCD monitors with sub-pixel antialiasing, there is essentially no difference between normal weight and bold weight.
So although bug 514493 is about restricting tahoma to wine, should we not also be reporting the LCD-bold issue upstream and getting that fixed? Should this have a different bug?
My comment on comments in #45ཿ
* "the original bug report was about the embedded bitmaps" - actually the original bug said it "makes sites look ugly in Firefox and other browsers"
* although the replacement tahoma font works fine for non-bold and bold on LCD monitors, on LCD monitors with sub-pixel antialiasing, there is essentially no difference between normal weight and bold weight.
Please see https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/baltix/ +bug/50529
So although bug 514493 is about restricting tahoma to wine, should we not also be reporting the LCD-bold issue upstream and getting that fixed? Should this have a different bug?