On Monday 23 October 2006 11:03, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I'm undecided. I'm all for bugfixes, sure. but wine is always a quite
> tricky thing. Stephan: How do you think about getting this version to
> feisty first, and then to edgy-backports short after it hits feisty?
> this way, user can choose which version they want to use.
That is something I would prefer at this stage of development.
the mentioned bug inside this UVF report, I couldn't reproduce but the
reporter said that he doesn't have this with 0.9.23 from winehq.
Anyways, for me I would prefer to wait for feisty.
Hi,
On Monday 23 October 2006 11:03, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I'm undecided. I'm all for bugfixes, sure. but wine is always a quite
> tricky thing. Stephan: How do you think about getting this version to
> feisty first, and then to edgy-backports short after it hits feisty?
> this way, user can choose which version they want to use.
That is something I would prefer at this stage of development.
the mentioned bug inside this UVF report, I couldn't reproduce but the
reporter said that he doesn't have this with 0.9.23 from winehq.
Anyways, for me I would prefer to wait for feisty.
Regards,
\sh
-- linux.blogweb. de/pages/ cv.html
SysAdmin and Linux Specialist
Freelancer, http://
JID: <email address hidden>