Comment 8 for bug 43324

Revision history for this message
Maxim (maximsch2) wrote : Re: [Bug 43324] Re: There is no 64 bit package available.

But I think that introducing such binary package is mach better and it seems
to me most users think same.

On 11/16/06, Stephan Hermann <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> on 64bit you could create a 32bit chroot and change into it via dchroot
> ...
> you can install wine 32bit in there and everything is ok.
>
> In my POV it's a better solution then to introduce additional binary
> packages for only one architecture.
>
> Regards,
>
> \sh
>
> --
> There is no 64 bit package available.
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/43324
>

--

Maxim