© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
(In reply to comment #203)
> You could equally that it's pulse not supporting Wine, and that the bug is
> pulse's issue.
No. Pulse is down stack from Wine. Wine does not support outputing to Pulse. There is no point in even arguing that.
> The absolute need
> for a separate winepulse has not been programatically demonstrated
The need for Wine-pulse has been demonstrated much more than the need for Wine itself. By your logic Wine should not exist - there are better implementations out there and they are still used. And if you install Windows in Virtualbox it will also work.
Your argumentation is absurd and is based on personal opinion only and yet you demand you opposition to provide dissertations to prove to you our point.
The rejection of PulsAudio Wine driver has not been technically proven nor has the code quality has been 'programatically demonstrated' to be unsacceptable for inclusion. Prove to use that including this code would make Wine worse!
> Please don't be inconsistent. Is it a matter of distros or "regular desktop
> users"?
Of course it is a matter of desktop users of desktop distributions! Have you forgotten what Wine is actually for??? Running desktop applications ringing a bell?
( I do appologise in advance for feeding the troll )