Comment 313 for bug 371897

Revision history for this message
In , Rotbart van Dainig (rotbart-van-dainig) wrote :

(In reply to comment #203)
> Seriously, there are better reasons for pulse to be supported
> than this.

Could you please state them?

> I have no objection to pulseaudio being supported *correctly*.

Could you please define what means "correctly" to you, too?