(In reply to comment #193)
> No. What it comes down to is no one has proven programatically that winealsa > can't be made to work with pulse's ALSA emulation.
Rather than kicking off the mud slinging again, how are we doing at getting the Open AL support into Wine that was discussed late last year?
That then makes the point moot.
(In reply to comment #193)
> No. What it comes down to is no one has proven programatically that winealsa
> can't be made to work with pulse's ALSA emulation.
Rather than kicking off the mud slinging again, how are we doing at
getting the Open AL support into Wine that was discussed late last
year?
That then makes the point moot.