© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
7020100
(Get the code!)
(In reply to comment #189)
> (In reply to comment #188)
> > You're saying that Wine _only_ needs to/should _only_ support what's "common"
> > and popular.
>
> No.
Hi,
sorry to ask, but what are the main reasons why Wine devs don't want to include this patch in the main tree?
I don't want to start any flame but here is a bit unclear between the huge amount of (very) detailed answers and is not easy to udnerstand the real reasons why.
Is it because:
*) patch code is of bad quality
*) patch is buggy
*) patch doesn't conform coding standard
*) patch is incomplete
*) pulse is present only in Linux and not on other architectures
*) current wine devs/mantainers don't want to mantain this piece of code even if it's well written and works?
Really, what are the reasons?
Thanks again,