Comment 259 for bug 371897
Revision history for this message
|
|
#259 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0f7b58d
(Get the code!)
(In reply to comment #153)
> 50ms latency from pulse is only achievable with the -rt branch kernel. For
> everything else, dmix does not suffer from such serious latency issues
> (especially in Wine, Skype etc).
/me is using the linus branch and pulse releases. *scratches head*
> If you've stopped trying to get Wine upstream to support pulse, this whole
> discussion is moot. So much for the "developer willing to maintain" argument.
I am, outside of wine currently.
> Assuming this is even possible. Even just a Proof of Concept would be helpful
> here.
Problem with writing a proof-of-concept for the wine project is that while it may be better, it will be regarded as too large a change and rejected unless it could be done incrementally. It's hard to make a horse and buggy into an automobile without being allowed to replace logical parts in their entirety.