Comment 232 for bug 371897

Revision history for this message
In , Walldorf2000 (walldorf2000) wrote :

(In reply to comment #125)
> Everyone, please. As Stefan said, more comments here don't help. It distracts
> developers from fixing bugs when they have to read through more long comments
> about PulseAudio.

This is why http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18740 should have been kept separately. The decision to mark it as a duprec lead to very much noise here. 18740 would be ideal to find someone to work on the save ALSA API.

Maybe the save ALSA API is an idea for the next SOC?

It is one thing not to accept a new PulseAudio driver in Wine due to concerns about maintenance. It is another thing to sabotage the usage of winehq.org to discuss and provide a separately maintained driver which has the chance to mature and enrich Wine in the future.

But it is your decision and I promise not to post here anymore until I have some really meaningful to say ...