© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
e3ace39
(Get the code!)
(In reply to comment #54)
> Hello,
>
> there is no need to provide test data.
> The problem is well known and a short-term hack-patch exists which was
> consequently rejected by AJ.
>
I was not aware of this. I was just trying to help out to show how it was on the latest version.
> Until someone takes up the task to implement "remote" custom actions (custom
> action server) you'll have to use the hack-patch.
>
Ok, that's a letdown.
> Unfortunately this whole bug is now messed up with many useless/irritating
> comments that have nothing to do with the original bug.
>
I am sorry if I have irritated you, it was a mistake, I thought the comment on the attachment was going to end up under the attachment details, an not on the bug, I had forgot how that worked. Please feel free to delete all comments you feel are redundant(like this one and the preceeding short discussion).