Unfortunately, no. It seems pretty clear that IInstaller & co. aren't the interfaces to the server, since they can still be created and used while the service is disabled. Rather, I suspect, the interface labeled IMsiServer (and probably also the unlabeled 000C1094) are the interfaces, and these are not documented either as coclass or IDispatch.
(In reply to Dmitry Timoshkov from comment #133) /www.winehq. org/pipermail/ wine-cvs/ 2007-January/ 029786. html /msdn.microsoft .com/en- us/library/ windows/ desktop/ aa369432( v=vs.85).
> Does this help?
> https:/
> https:/
> aspx
Unfortunately, no. It seems pretty clear that IInstaller & co. aren't the interfaces to the server, since they can still be created and used while the service is disabled. Rather, I suspect, the interface labeled IMsiServer (and probably also the unlabeled 000C1094) are the interfaces, and these are not documented either as coclass or IDispatch.