(In reply to comment #2)
> I may have misunderstood the reporter. I thought this was a case of a program
> waiting to detect when a new floppy is inserted and then working automatically
> when it is; that would imply it's telling the operating system something
> different from just "read the file on disk". If that were the case then in
> theory Wine could respect that system call
Whether or not you have to umount/mount the floppy is up to the distribution, and unrelated to the whether notification occurs when a floppy change happens.
Even if such a notification existed in the distribution, there's no corresponding notification you could send in Wine that would change the Windows program's behavior, as there's no Windows signal that a floppy change has in fact occurred.
(In reply to comment #2)
> I may have misunderstood the reporter. I thought this was a case of a program
> waiting to detect when a new floppy is inserted and then working automatically
> when it is; that would imply it's telling the operating system something
> different from just "read the file on disk". If that were the case then in
> theory Wine could respect that system call
Windows doesn't have such a notification. See e.g. Raymond Chen: blogs.msdn. com/oldnewthing /archive/ 2009/04/ 02/9528175. aspx
http://
Whether or not you have to umount/mount the floppy is up to the distribution, and unrelated to the whether notification occurs when a floppy change happens.
Even if such a notification existed in the distribution, there's no corresponding notification you could send in Wine that would change the Windows program's behavior, as there's no Windows signal that a floppy change has in fact occurred.