Comment 14 for bug 1979121

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

Sorry Seb that this has fallen through the cracks :-/

I've seen and confirmed that this is indeed the same that was reviewed and approved in Kinetic (0.0.5-5~22.04.1).

So all former statements apply and this is IMHO indeed good to go.

It does not add huge extra load for maintenance as going forward it will be in LTSes anyway.
Recently this got way more mature, at least in terms of version number 0.0.5 -> 0.2.4 sounds like a lot.
But since 0.0.5 was reviewed and approved by MIR and security team that does not need to stop us here.

The tests that you added look good on jammy:
- https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/w/webp-pixbuf-loader/jammy/amd64

Approving for promoting this in Jammy as well.