(In reply to comment #78)
> Created an attachment (id=31684) [details]
> split fontconfig files
>
> Here is a conter-proposal with the fontconfig files properly split per font (ie
> I want a setup that any individual packager can trivially copy when he needs to
> package a new cjk font, not something that lefts him scratching his head and
> feel he'll go nowhere without going through the fontconfig packager)
I also agree that separate .conf looks clean and they should be in the
fonts packages themselves as much as possible. The current
blob of fontconfig rules seems quite unmaintainable.
> Also provided are the scripts used to generate them from an easily changed csv
> file
Have you thought of including something like it in Fedora's fontpackages package? :)
I dunno if we still need some bits of 65-nonlatin.conf around for now until distros stop depending on it completely?
(In reply to comment #78)
> Created an attachment (id=31684) [details]
> split fontconfig files
>
> Here is a conter-proposal with the fontconfig files properly split per font (ie
> I want a setup that any individual packager can trivially copy when he needs to
> package a new cjk font, not something that lefts him scratching his head and
> feel he'll go nowhere without going through the fontconfig packager)
I also agree that separate .conf looks clean and they should be in the
fonts packages themselves as much as possible. The current
blob of fontconfig rules seems quite unmaintainable.
> Also provided are the scripts used to generate them from an easily changed csv
> file
Have you thought of including something like it in Fedora's fontpackages package? :)
I dunno if we still need some bits of 65-nonlatin.conf around for now until distros stop depending on it completely?