On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 07:34 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Approved, just bindings. Contrary to the MIR, I promoted the
> documentation package, too. I don't see a reason to not include
> documentation into main as well, and its dependency (monodoc-manual) is
> in main as well. If there is something problematic about monodoc-webkit-
> manual, please let me know here, and I demote it again.
Thanks a lot Martin.
I don't know of a problem with doing that, directhex might know of
one.
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 07:34 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Approved, just bindings. Contrary to the MIR, I promoted the
> documentation package, too. I don't see a reason to not include
> documentation into main as well, and its dependency (monodoc-manual) is
> in main as well. If there is something problematic about monodoc-webkit-
> manual, please let me know here, and I demote it again.
Thanks a lot Martin.
I don't know of a problem with doing that, directhex might know of
one.
Thanks,
James