The implementation of QStorageInfo calls in to statvfs64, which tries to access /proc/<pid>/mounts and /dev/disk/by-label/, so there doesn’t seem to be a way around this without patching QStorageInfo. An out-of-process storage API would be ideal indeed. On whose plate would that fall?
The implementation of QStorageInfo calls in to statvfs64, which tries to access /proc/<pid>/mounts and /dev/disk/ by-label/ , so there doesn’t seem to be a way around this without patching QStorageInfo. An out-of-process storage API would be ideal indeed. On whose plate would that fall?