On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:37:20 -0000
Rogério Theodoro de Brito <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:37, KarlGoetz <email address hidden> wrote:
> > please explain why you think this is opinion
>
> Debian opinion != FSF opinion
Indeed. And != Ubuntu opinion too.
> Furthermore, vrms works by looking at the section of the package to
> base its decisions on. If it reports something incorrectly, then there
> are two possibilities (which not exclude one from another):
>
> 1. there is a bug in vrms
> 2. there is a bug in the packaging, where an incorrect section of the
> package is declared.
Given this was filed against ubuntu when Gobuntu was being developed,
I'm tempted to suggest this bug should be marked 'invalid'.
thanks,
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
*** I've changed GPG key to 6C097260 ***
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:37:20 -0000
Rogério Theodoro de Brito <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:37, KarlGoetz <email address hidden> wrote:
> > please explain why you think this is opinion
>
> Debian opinion != FSF opinion
Indeed. And != Ubuntu opinion too.
> Furthermore, vrms works by looking at the section of the package to
> base its decisions on. If it reports something incorrectly, then there
> are two possibilities (which not exclude one from another):
>
> 1. there is a bug in vrms
> 2. there is a bug in the packaging, where an incorrect section of the
> package is declared.
Given this was filed against ubuntu when Gobuntu was being developed,
I'm tempted to suggest this bug should be marked 'invalid'.
thanks,
kk
-- www.kgoetz. id.au
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS)
http://
No, I won't join your social networking group
*** I've changed GPG key to 6C097260 ***