21:08:14 < chrisccoulson> siretart - that gnome-screensaver patch
makes the assumption that the MIT-SCREEN-SAVER extension is
always available, which might not always be the case
21:09:53 < siretart> chrisccoulson: oh, can you perhaps improve
the patch to check for that extension?
21:15:07 < chrisccoulson> siretart - i'll have a look if i get
the chance, but the patch doesn't really look right anyway.
gnome-screensaver currently gets session idle-ness from
gnome-session, which uses the SYNC extension and IDLETIME
counter. applications which want to inhibit the screensaver
should really be the gnome-session inhibit API now, although
it would be nice to get gnome-screensaver to work correctly
too
21:16:54 < siretart> slangasek: based on chrisccoulson comments,
please reject my gnome-screensaver upload :(
status update:
21:08:14 < chrisccoulson> siretart - that gnome-screensaver patch
makes the assumption that the MIT-SCREEN-SAVER extension is
always available, which might not always be the case
21:09:53 < siretart> chrisccoulson: oh, can you perhaps improve
the patch to check for that extension?
21:15:07 < chrisccoulson> siretart - i'll have a look if i get screensaver currently gets session idle-ness from
the chance, but the patch doesn't really look right anyway.
gnome-
gnome-session, which uses the SYNC extension and IDLETIME
counter. applications which want to inhibit the screensaver
should really be the gnome-session inhibit API now, although
it would be nice to get gnome-screensaver to work correctly
too
21:16:54 < siretart> slangasek: based on chrisccoulson comments,
please reject my gnome-screensaver upload :(
21:18:32 < slangasek> siretart: ok, rejected
IOW: the patch needs more work :-(