(In reply to Lubos Lunak from comment #42) > I don't see the dwarf spec being specific on how to interpret this, but then > I think my way is the only logical one.
Yes, I keep getting confused. We only want the read the value in. So pushed as is:
commit 026cda6c8111ef6ff79bd5c6e083ab50ccf3ded6 Author: Luboš Luňák <email address hidden> Date: Tue Apr 26 13:53:14 2022 +0200
support DW_FORM_addrx3 and DW_FORM_strx3
Apparently these may get used after all with large enough binaries, despite being somewhat tricky with regard to endianess.
(In reply to Lubos Lunak from comment #42)
> I don't see the dwarf spec being specific on how to interpret this, but then
> I think my way is the only logical one.
Yes, I keep getting confused. We only want the read the value in.
So pushed as is:
commit 026cda6c8111ef6 ff79bd5c6e083ab 50ccf3ded6
Author: Luboš Luňák <email address hidden>
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:53:14 2022 +0200
support DW_FORM_addrx3 and DW_FORM_strx3
Apparently these may get used after all with large enough binaries,
despite being somewhat tricky with regard to endianess.