Ubuntu
uwsgi package

  1. Bug #1820227
  2. Comment #5

Comment 5 for bug 1820227

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

Yeah, I agree that uwsgi is a beast.

When trying alternatives (after all WSGI is supposed to be a specification) there is a better candidate thou. gunicorn is in universe and big as well, but we'd have src:mod-wsgi providing httpd-wsgi as well through libapache2-mod-wsgi.
And that was already in main [1] and could easily be repromoted.
I guess we have to take the action to evaluate if this replacement would be fully functional.

[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mod-wsgi/+bug/566537