Comment 20 for bug 579858

Just got the update (I assume current?) and find the patch of comment 15 has been included for umount.c but nothing appears to have been done to fstab.c to prevent NULL names being passed through (along the lines of my patch of comment 9 above).

This, I assume, explains why Etienne Goyer still sees the segafault. Please can someone explain why the passing of a NULL name should still be allowed if it causes this?