Comment 17 for bug 2019856

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

This looks low risk, but also low impact (how important is it to have the correct model name output in lscpu?) in a core package installed on all users' systems. I'm fine with the idea of such a change being included in an SRU, but I think we wouldn't normally push an SRU *just* for a change such as this.

I would be ok with this being tagged block-proposed to keep it in -proposed until another high-impact change comes along, or having it bundled now with other high-impact fixes if there are any. Does that sound appropriate to you?