Thanks for the updated debdiffs and reporting Debian bug 966106
(Please feel free to comment in the LP bug when you report a Debian bug.)
Per the Debian maintainer, they recently stopped shipping/installing rename.ul, on 2.35.2-5.
Fortunately this only affects Groovy and later (non LTS.)
So, Debian moved to 2.36 (which contains the fix) and Groovy followed, with a 2.36-based package in -proposed right now.
This is good as we don't need the debdiff/core-developer review/upload to Groovy/devel release.
I'm watching the -proposed migration on Groovy (had to check re-run some failed autopkgtests [1] which are blocking it.)
And after Groovy has 2.36 released, I'll upload to Focal.
(This week Focal is in release freeze, so not a problem.)
Hi Seyeong,
Thanks for the updated debdiffs and reporting Debian bug 966106
(Please feel free to comment in the LP bug when you report a Debian bug.)
Per the Debian maintainer, they recently stopped shipping/installing rename.ul, on 2.35.2-5.
Fortunately this only affects Groovy and later (non LTS.)
So, Debian moved to 2.36 (which contains the fix) and Groovy followed, with a 2.36-based package in -proposed right now. core-developer review/upload to Groovy/devel release.
This is good as we don't need the debdiff/
I'm watching the -proposed migration on Groovy (had to check re-run some failed autopkgtests [1] which are blocking it.)
And after Groovy has 2.36 released, I'll upload to Focal.
(This week Focal is in release freeze, so not a problem.)
cheers,
Mauricio
[1] https:/ /people. canonical. com/~ubuntu- archive/ proposed- migration/ update_ excuses. html