klerfayt wrote:
> @ reporters with colorful garbage screens, if
>
> /etc/modprobe.d/options
> options nvidia NVreg_UseVBios=0
>
> fixes your problem, then it's most likely the duplicate of two year old
> bug #85451
>
That gave the error "Unknown parameter "NVreg_UseVBios" on boot and
also made the system hang on bootup. Perhaps this option doesn't work
with the 96.xx drivers?
- From my own testing here's some conclusions I've come to.
1) This is not a problem with the Nvidia binary driver. I can
reproduce this with the "nv" driver as well
2) However, this may specific to Nvidia cards as I couldn't reproduce
it with Intel graphics
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
klerfayt wrote: d/options
> @ reporters with colorful garbage screens, if
>
> /etc/modprobe.
> options nvidia NVreg_UseVBios=0
>
> fixes your problem, then it's most likely the duplicate of two year old
> bug #85451
>
That gave the error "Unknown parameter "NVreg_UseVBios" on boot and
also made the system hang on bootup. Perhaps this option doesn't work
with the 96.xx drivers?
- From my own testing here's some conclusions I've come to.
1) This is not a problem with the Nvidia binary driver. I can
reproduce this with the "nv" driver as well
2) However, this may specific to Nvidia cards as I couldn't reproduce
it with Intel graphics
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
K0lhiAAoJEIltSr FpUGtej7IH/ 2cBfOToMz6JMt5C Xs67NKz5 Y75YP3DoalSdheH KO2YA2etbJ8qD0z NFHTybGDYxVvcb1 RNsw os37v/yN+ VbBfC905E+ +vVqXB3KRxL7sKD rcIDz/kHXRrGXeb 24HoUuIM uBzfYHE3/ vHUXObdTOwO+ avVe1w0t0RUuS/ WHsUkKenejiYkm pNHybI1UnBMh5P0 0T1oykqbwuoPBLP wTaJMgYxh7RHdV/ SL8I zABOhNgY4QGywni hYnSONHpwfO+ fdHz3hMZxxZlGPj ABhPPE=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJ
9bR10YgJTPJZcPV
CrYyO6+
/h7ST92mCDmrd0K
r1tLvQBkgcShAnI
byHyCon9tEWdQNL
=+HtI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----