> It seems to me that ureadahead should absolutely not be run on a system with only 128 mb of ram
> and probably not 256 either
Should ureadahead compare the amount of data it will try to load with the RAM size? Hard-coding a threshold like 128MB or 256MB seems like a bad idea, because this won't be robust against future changes to the footprint of the base system.
> It seems to me that ureadahead should absolutely not be run on a system with only 128 mb of ram
> and probably not 256 either
Should ureadahead compare the amount of data it will try to load with the RAM size? Hard-coding a threshold like 128MB or 256MB seems like a bad idea, because this won't be robust against future changes to the footprint of the base system.