Comment 11 for bug 552786

Revision history for this message
Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote : Re: [Bug 552786] Re: initctl: lacks proper exit codes

On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 19:13 +0000, Andrew Pollock wrote:

> I'm thinking about interoperability. If, for example, Lucid is going to
> continue to provide legacy init scripts for Upstart jobs, those legacy
> init scripts should continue to operate in as compatible a manner as
> possible.
>
Yes, but this only says what "upstart-job" should emulate -- it doesn't
specify what status itself should return.

Also it's worth jumping up and down at this point and saying that
upstart-job should emulate Debian Policy *not* LSB (they conflict)

Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?