On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 09:55 +0000, Lars Düsing wrote:
> I'm wondering why this bug has a importance of "low", as it renders
> using upstart for many daemons (including apache, postfix and others) as
> impossible.
>
Because conversion of those daemons over to Upstart is not a priority;
just carry on using the existing init script.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 09:55 +0000, Lars Düsing wrote:
> I'm wondering why this bug has a importance of "low", as it renders
> using upstart for many daemons (including apache, postfix and others) as
> impossible.
>
Because conversion of those daemons over to Upstart is not a priority;
just carry on using the existing init script.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?