That is the point though. If retaining conventions of the past is such an important factor, then I wonder why I could (until recently, at least) issue 'shutdown now' or 'reboot now' on any machine running debian/ubuntu, and it would complete a full power-off, or reset, respectively, each time...
If you wish to insist that, well, I was 'doing it wrong' for what could well be 20+ years in my case prior to these changes, then I am happily to concede that. However, if that is the case, then I wish know why it behaved the way I have described until these recent changes. You see, these bugs (1174272 & 1065851) were confirmed by others, implying that others have also experienced the 'unexpected' (unintuivie/'buggy') effects of these changes. If indeed shutdown only powers-off when '-h/-H' is used, and reboot is expected to revert to single-user mode when 'now' is supplied as an argument [who would have thought...?]) then it would seem that the method I've used for the past 20+ years, or to rephrase: 'the way shutdown has worked' for at least the last couple of years, that I can recall, has been recently changed? Surely mere convention is no excuse to obstruct progress to code in any case...
That is the point though. If retaining conventions of the past is such an important factor, then I wonder why I could (until recently, at least) issue 'shutdown now' or 'reboot now' on any machine running debian/ubuntu, and it would complete a full power-off, or reset, respectively, each time... 'buggy' ) effects of these changes. If indeed shutdown only powers-off when '-h/-H' is used, and reboot is expected to revert to single-user mode when 'now' is supplied as an argument [who would have thought...?]) then it would seem that the method I've used for the past 20+ years, or to rephrase: 'the way shutdown has worked' for at least the last couple of years, that I can recall, has been recently changed? Surely mere convention is no excuse to obstruct progress to code in any case...
If you wish to insist that, well, I was 'doing it wrong' for what could well be 20+ years in my case prior to these changes, then I am happily to concede that. However, if that is the case, then I wish know why it behaved the way I have described until these recent changes. You see, these bugs (1174272 & 1065851) were confirmed by others, implying that others have also experienced the 'unexpected' (unintuivie/