Comment 22 for bug 1893716

I re-installed the former package content, rebooted the system and gave it some more memory to get rid of any concerns in that regard (from the perf data).

The diff of the actual content before/after was all reasonable (new times, different package counts, but otherwise the same)

Consumption wise we have:

# Before fixes
real 1m11.731s
us sy id wa st
71 20 9 0 0

    59.16% landscape-sysin
    14.23% swapper
     6.16% sshd
     5.78% lsb_release
     3.35% apt-config
     0.86% dbus-daemon
     0.80% systemd
     0.59% gdbus
     0.56% dpkg
     0.48% systemd-logind

# After fixes

real 0m21.257s
us sy id wa st
32 34 34 0 0

    42.00% swapper
    22.45% sshd
     2.94% dbus-daemon
     2.79% systemd
     2.08% gdbus
     2.07% grep
     1.88% run-parts
     1.58% systemd-logind
     1.46% find
     1.23% bash
     1.22% update-motd-fsc
     1.18% systemd-journal
     1.13% cat

That is good.
Ready to open MRs for this.

At a very high summary:
- delay cut down by 2/3 of the initial duration
- consumption reduced by 71% (duration) and by 26% (consumption while running).
  This is multiplicative so for the example we have an saving of ~81.27% of cpu cycles