On 31 January 2013 13:20, shankao <email address hidden> wrote:
>> That report and its fix only applies to the aptdaemon backend. The
>>problem is still present in the synaptic backend, which this report
>>specifically refers to.
>
> Should not be the bug report changed to synaptic in that case?
Synaptic already has a report filed about the limitations of the
particular interface. This report is more than that, concerning how
update-manager uses synaptic. As stated in a previous comment, it is
possible to fix this with small modifications to update-manager.
On 31 January 2013 13:20, shankao <email address hidden> wrote:
>> That report and its fix only applies to the aptdaemon backend. The
>>problem is still present in the synaptic backend, which this report
>>specifically refers to.
>
> Should not be the bug report changed to synaptic in that case?
Synaptic already has a report filed about the limitations of the
particular interface. This report is more than that, concerning how
update-manager uses synaptic. As stated in a previous comment, it is
possible to fix this with small modifications to update-manager.