Speaking to mvo about this he believes its possible that update-manager and aptdaemon were updated but that the running aptdaemon was not replaced with the new version of aptdaemon. Subsequently, the flag was passed to aptdaemon and it didn't know how to handle it.
Looking at the Aptdaemon.txt attachment in this bug report we can see the same process id used for aptdaemon even after the package is upgraded.
Speaking to mvo about this he believes its possible that update-manager and aptdaemon were updated but that the running aptdaemon was not replaced with the new version of aptdaemon. Subsequently, the flag was passed to aptdaemon and it didn't know how to handle it.
Looking at the Aptdaemon.txt attachment in this bug report we can see the same process id used for aptdaemon even after the package is upgraded.
Log started: 2015-10-12 11:10:01 aptdaemon. pkcompat_ 1.1.1+bzr982- 0ubuntu13_ all.deb ... aptdaemon. pkcompat (1.1.1+ bzr982- 0ubuntu13) over (1.1.1+ bzr982- 0ubuntu12) ... aptdaemon. gtk3widgets_ 1.1.1+bzr982- 0ubuntu13_ all.deb ... aptdaemon. gtk3widgets (1.1.1+ bzr982- 0ubuntu13) over (1.1.1+ bzr982- 0ubuntu12) ... 1.1.1+bzr982- 0ubuntu13_ all.deb ... bzr982- 0ubuntu13) over (1.1.1+ bzr982- 0ubuntu12) ... aptdaemon_ 1.1.1+bzr982- 0ubuntu13_ all.deb ... bzr982- 0ubuntu13) over (1.1.1+ bzr982- 0ubuntu12) ... bzr982- 0ubuntu13) ... aptdaemon. pkcompat (1.1.1+ bzr982- 0ubuntu13) ... aptdaemon. gtk3widgets (1.1.1+ bzr982- 0ubuntu13) ... bzr982- 0ubuntu13) ...
(Reading database ...
(Reading database ... 5%
(Reading database ... 10%
(Reading database ... 15%
(Reading database ... 20%
(Reading database ... 25%
(Reading database ... 30%
(Reading database ... 35%
(Reading database ... 40%
(Reading database ... 45%
(Reading database ... 50%
(Reading database ... 55%
(Reading database ... 60%
(Reading database ... 65%
(Reading database ... 70%
(Reading database ... 75%
(Reading database ... 80%
(Reading database ... 85%
(Reading database ... 90%
(Reading database ... 95%
(Reading database ... 100%
(Reading database ... 870936 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../python3-
Unpacking python3-
Preparing to unpack .../python3-
Unpacking python3-
Preparing to unpack .../aptdaemon_
Unpacking aptdaemon (1.1.1+
Preparing to unpack .../python3-
Unpacking python3-aptdaemon (1.1.1+
Processing triggers for dbus (1.10.0-1ubuntu1) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.3-1) ...
Setting up python3-aptdaemon (1.1.1+
Setting up python3-
Setting up python3-
Setting up aptdaemon (1.1.1+
Log ended: 2015-10-12 11:10:06
Oct 12 11:09:23 impulse AptDaemon[7097]: INFO: Initializing daemon apt[1349] : 11:09:23 AptDaemon [INFO]: Initializing daemon PackageKit[ 7097]: INFO: Initializing PackageKit compat layer apt[1349] : 11:09:23 AptDaemon. PackageKit [INFO]: Initializing PackageKit compat layer apt[1349] : 11:09:23 AptDaemon [INFO]: UpdateCache() was called apt[1349] : 11:12:45 AptDaemon.Worker [INFO]: Updating cache Worker[ 7097]: INFO: Finished transaction /org/debian/ apt/transaction /458231a0ba3346 518ce0f4c60fff5 0ee apt[1349] : 11:12:49 AptDaemon.Worker [INFO]: Finished transaction /org/debian/ apt/transaction /458231a0ba3346 518ce0f4c60fff5 0ee [dbus.String( 'kinit# auto'), ...
Oct 12 11:09:23 impulse org.debian.
Oct 12 11:09:23 impulse AptDaemon.
Oct 12 11:09:23 impulse org.debian.
Oct 12 11:09:23 impulse AptDaemon[7097]: INFO: UpdateCache() was called
Oct 12 11:09:23 impulse org.debian.
...........
Oct 12 11:12:45 impulse org.debian.
Oct 12 11:12:49 impulse AptDaemon.
Oct 12 11:12:49 impulse org.debian.
Oct 12 11:12:57 impulse AptDaemon[7097]: INFO: CommitPackages() was called: dbus.Array(
So this theory seems likely.