yeah, should be 8 not 4.
back in F-10 with unixODBC-2.2.12-9.fc10 we get 8 unix-ODBC-2.2.11 on debian gives 8
so it just looks like unixODBC-2.2.14 in F-11/rawhide that gives the incorrect 4
yeah, should be 8 not 4.
back in F-10 with unixODBC- 2.2.12- 9.fc10 we get 8
unix-ODBC-2.2.11 on debian gives 8
so it just looks like unixODBC-2.2.14 in F-11/rawhide that gives the incorrect 4